top of page
  • jengroundwater
  • Jun 23
  • 5 min read

Presentation re BC Budget, June 2025


"The presentation went well," says Megan Ardyche, who made the presentation on behalf of SOFT-CV. "It was serendipitous that we followed immediately after a logging advocacy group's presentation. The speaker had previously worked for the Truck Loggers Association. Their ask, in a nutshell, was for the province to relax all regulations and not to implement the recommendations of the Old Growth Strategic Review Panel (though he didn't use that name)." She continues, "He gave the GDP figure that I have below as proof of how valuable the industry is to the Provincial government. I had taken the GDP numbers [highlighted below in yellow] out of my presentation due to time restrictions, so I didn't get to clarify that the forestry industry contributes much less to GDP than tourism does."
Another SOFT-CV member who attended says, "Megan did an excellent job, and it was plain the committee was really surprised to hear the statistics, as the truck loggers rep [spoke] about how much [forestry does] for the Province, and that seems to be the standard thinking.  The committee asked for the link to the article, so thank you, Megan, for putting out this effort."

British Columbia promotes itself to the world as Super, Natural British Columbia

According to a government website, “tourism is a key driver of the provincial economy. Despite consisting mainly of small businesses, the tourism sector is one of the largest employers in B.C., significantly contributing to economic growth and community well-being.”


What follows is a very brief compare-and-contrast of the economic contributions and costs of tourism versus logging to BC’s economy.


These figures of the logging industry are from 2022 and the tourism figures are from 2022 and 2023, so they are roughly comparable.


  • Tourism employed over 125,700 people; logging and related industry employed approximately 100,000. 


  • Tourism resulted in $5.9 billion in wages and salaries in 2023, 11.8% higher than in 2022;


  • Logging and related industries resulted in approximately $9.1 billion.


There were 16,860 tourism businesses in operation in 2023, mostly in small communities, many of them remote and, increasingly, more of them Indigenous owned. 92% of those are small businesses (employing fewer than 50 employees) and they directly contribute to their local community economies.


Nearly half of tourism businesses (40%) are located outside Vancouver and the Lower Mainland, again benefitting local and often remote communities.

 

In contrast, logging and related industries total about 1,496 logging or forestry companies and those are primarily large, multinational companies whose profits do not stay in the community, or even in BC.


Tourism contributed $22.1 billion in revenue to the province in 2023, 12.4% higher than 2022; logging contributed $6.6 billion in government revenue.


In terms of provincial GDP, tourism contributed $9.7 billion (3.1%). Forestry, logging, and support activities contributed $5.5 billion.


In terms of reconciliation, a labour market report by Indigenous Tourism BC (ITBC) found that, in 2017, more than 400 Indigenous tourism-focused businesses were operating in the province, which contributed about $705 million in gross domestic output to the provincial economy and more than 7,400 full-time jobs, 48 per cent of which were filled by Indigenous people. These businesses represented $387 million in wages and salaries and more than $39 million in tax revenue.


Conversely, since 2002, the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations has signed forest tenure agreements with 175 of the 203 First Nations in BC. These agreements provide $324 million in revenue-sharing. (https://www.ictinc.ca/blog/forestry-and-reconciliation-focus-on-bc )


In 2021, approximately 5,315 Indigenous workers were directly employed in the BC forest industry, making up about 9% of the total workforce. 


There are also provincial costs associated with clearcut logging, which significantly offset any revenues received. Prime among those costs are … 

  • Subsidies: 

    • According to a 2021 article by investigative reporter David Broadland, “over the past 10 years…the cost to the public purse of managing BC’s publicly-owned forests has exceeded all direct revenue collected from the forest industry by $3.65 billion. BC taxpayers are, on average, providing a subsidy of $365 million each year to forest companies that operate in BC.

    • That figure of $3.65 billion is derived from publicly available accounts published by the Province of BC. Those accounts show that, on the revenue side, BC collected $6.41 billion in stumpage between 2009 and 2019. It also collected about $300 million through the BC Logging Tax. Together they produced revenue of $6.71 billion.

    • On the expense side, figures published in annual Ministry of Forests Service Plan Reports over those 10 years show total expenditures of $10,363,595,000.

    • That works out to an accumulated loss of $3,652,460,667.”


  • There are other costs related to increased carbon emissions & mitigation of global warming, contributed to by logging.

  • Forests' ability to regulate the movement of rainwater and snowmelt through forested landscapes can be degraded by industrial logging, impacting runoff into creeks, rivers and lakes; and rapid snowmelt resulting in more frequent droughts impacting agriculture, resulting in local food insecurity.

  • Communities and ecosystems are more exposed and prone to one of climate change’s most catastrophic impacts: extreme flooding.

  • Landslides:

    • Clearcutting forests can degrade forest structure, leading to more landslides. One study finds that nearly half of the around 1,300 landslides that occurred during B.C.'s November 2021 atmospheric river event started in areas burned by wildfire or disturbed by logging.

    • The Ministry of Transportation has estimated that the cost to repair roads damaged by landslides and washouts reached almost $500 million in 2023. Additionally, temporary repairs to highways after the 2021 floods were estimated at $210 million. 

  • Wildfires:

    • 2024: The province has invested roughly $387 million into fire suppression, response and preparedness. 

    • 2023: The most expensive and destructive wildfire season to date, the Province spent approximately $770 million. Of course, not all of these ancillary costs are due solely to logging, but they are related.

  • Law enforcement : 

    • During the Fairy Creek blockades, the RCMP spent $3.75 million in five months of enforcement. Under the current Provincial Police Service Agreement, BC would be on the hook for approximately $2.6 million. That is over one summer. 

    • Clayoquot Sound: While I don’t have costs for policing at Clayoquot Sound, in 1996 the provincial government covered the extra costs for MacMillan Bloedel to log the territory in an ecologically sound way in a three-year, $9.3 million deal.  


So, in closing, it seems clear that sound fiscal management would dictate that logging of our old-growth forests is an expense that [for] this government - and the people of BC - simply doesn't make economic sense.


Referring back to the beginning, tourism is a key economic driver in BC. Super, Natural British Columbia doesn’t promote clearcuts. People from around the world come to see our incredible ancient trees and the amazingly biodiverse forests. These forests are a renewable resource in the sense that they will persist and continue to thrive without major intervention from humans. Logging, on the other hand, is rapidly depleting a non-renewable resource. The old-growth trees and forests that are cut will never regenerate - at least not in any of our or even our grandchildren’s lifetimes. These forests themselves are thousands of years old, constantly regenerating themselves. Many of the individual huge trees we currently have are a thousand years old - or they were before all the clearcuts. 


When making your budget decisions, we ask that you consider all the benefits of retaining the old-growth forest ecosystems we have left. They are a greater benefit to BC’s economic health than cutting them down is. Simply put, they are worth more standing. 


Remember, the BC taxpayers are actually paying more to the logging companies than the province gets from them.


We aren’t suggesting there should be no logging. There are enough existing clearcuts that can be turned into tree plantations, as many already are. The companies can harvest second- or third-growth trees. And, we would suggest, the companies start supporting themselves, rather than taxpayers supporting them.


And in the end, preserving the remaining old-growth forests is just the right thing to do. Super, Natural British Columbia - let’s make sure it doesn’t disappear altogether.

 
 
 

There are a lot of issues facing the community as the OCP process continues. Probably not a single one is a yes/no, either/or, zero-sum issue. Planning for our future is complicated! SOFT- CV recognizes that we need affordable housing, sufficient infrastructure, fire management resources, schools, recreational amenities, etc., as well as a healthy tree canopy. If you are interested in advocating for tree protection in Comox, here are a few questions you could ask. Thanks to SCUF - Save Comox Urban Forests for these ideas:


1) Where are the future potential development sites? Keep an eye for which areas are currently treed. Express concern about these.


2) On large undeveloped properties identified for future development, suggest that preliminary ecological and environmental surveys be completed by Registered Professional Biologists (RPBios) prior to determining an area's zoning or potential land use.


3) On deep private properties - Are they  / can they be mandated to be four-plexes?  Can we prioritize NOT cutting trees on these properties?


4) There appears to be a huge disconnect between the current OCP and the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) and Tree Bylaw. How will the timing coincide between these 3 critical policies? How is Town & Council ensuring there will be trees left to save?


5) On the far side of Torrence (456 & 480 Torrence Rd.), there is a large forested area that's currently in the CVRD, outside of Comox boundaries. Info in italics is from the Town.


The Town of Comox is proposing to extend its boundaries to include:


> ➡️ North ½ of Lot 20, District Lot 186, Plan 449 (PID 001-095-544)


> ➡️ Lot A, District Lot 186, Plan 24247 (PID 002-992-647 – 480 Torrence


Road)


> ➡️ North ½ of the South ½ of Lot 20, District Lot 186, Plan 449 (PID


009-047-671 – 456 Torrence Road)


> If you are an eligible elector and oppose this proposal, submit an Elector Response Form by this Friday,June 6 Find out all the details here: 



Comox is likely to accept, or has already accepted, these Torrence properties as becoming part of Town. Private owners are assumed.


SCUF's thinking is that they can possibly better speak up to save the trees in this area if it is actually part of the Town. Unfortunately time is running out for the public to have its say as a result of the new Alternative Approval Process adopted by the Town of Comox, where lack of interest for a proposal is assumed and interpreted as Public Approval. Is there a plan to annex this area into the Town of Comox?  If annexed - will it be protected??



6) What other opportunities will there be for the public to see the final draft plan? Will the Town of Comox solicit more public feedback? Will the public be able to comment on the final document? Has there been enough communication about this very important process and document?


7) Will the Town of Comox be presenting the final OCP to the public with an opportunity for the public to ask questions and participate in discussion.

 
 
 

Well over 600 community donors (including many SOFT-CV members and supporters) contributed to raise the funds to purchase the forest and save it from being logged.

Thanks to a fantastic community response, this biodiverse and beloved forest will never be logged. Read the CV Land Trust's media release here.


The 100-hectare (247-acre) forest is on BC Hydro’s property along the Puntledge River, just below Comox Lake. The Puntledge Forest is a beloved recreational area and a rare local example of a mature, biodiverse forest. Mature forests are extremely important for biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and for providing opportunities for people to spend time in nature. The Puntledge Forest supports dozens of species of conservation concern, including an endangered summer run of Chinook salmon. The forest and river are highly valued by the K’ómoks First Nation for fish habitat and cultural values.


Campaign Milestones

The CVLT secured federal funding to purchase 29 hectares of the timber reservation in March 2023, and another 32 hectares in April 2024. Both purchases were funded by Environment and Climate Change Canada. The third and final phase of the campaign began in June 2024, and required the CVLT to raise $2.4 million dollars in just seven months! They were delighted by the community response, and by the support received from five separate granting agencies and from the former timber rights holder, Manulife Investment Management, and the landowner BC Hydro. Phase three protects the final 37 hectares of the forest from logging, forever.


History of the Site

The Puntledge River is at the heart of the K’omoks First Nation’s traditional territory. It was officially named in 1854 after the PE’ntlatc tribe – one of several tribes now affiliated with the K’omoks First Nation – who lived along it. However the Puntledge Forest has been privately owned since 1884, when most of eastern Vancouver Island was granted to the coal baron Robert Dunsmuir in exchange for building a railway.


Mining operations began on the site in 1902, and a company town was built by 1911. The mining operations continued for 20 years, supported by electricity generated through a dam and associated infrastructure at the outlet of Comox Lake, The abandoned town, surrounding lands and infrastructure were acquired in the 1950’s by a predecessor of BC Hydro. However, the original landowners retained rights to the trees through a Timber Reservation registered on the land title. This means that while BC Hydro owns the land, they do not own the trees. This became clear in 2020 when the then-owner of the Timber Reservation, Manulife Investment Management, began planning for tree harvesting.


Ecological and Recreational Values

The Puntledge Forest was logged during the mining era, making it 100 to 120 years old.


It was allowed to regenerate naturally, which means it has much more biodiversity than a tree plantation. In a century this forest will be considered “old growth.” As a mature forest it already serves many important functions. It includes up to 30 listed species (i.e. of conservation concern), and 22 plant communities that are listed as rare (i.e., endangered or threatened). As a low elevation coastal forest, it also has very high carbon capture and storage potential, making its preservation an important natural climate solution.

The Puntledge River is one of the most significant salmon producing rivers in the Strait of Georgia (Salish Sea). On average it is the second largest producer of Chinook, coho and pink salmon, and fourth largest producer for chum salmon. It has two Chinook runs: a fall run and a smaller, endangered and genetically distinct summer run. It also has a winter and summer run of Steelhead, and resident trout including Cutthroat, which is a listed species in BC. The Forest connects to the Comox Lake Bluffs Ecological Reserve to the south and Nymph Falls Regional Park to the North, providing a biodiversity corridor along the Puntledge River.


The trails in the park are maintained by BC Hydro, and are a beloved destination for the community. This stretch of the Puntledge River is also a popular destination for swimmers and paddlers.

 
 
 

Save Our Forests Team - Comox Valley

  • Facebook
  • YouTube

gilakas’la / čɛčɛ haθɛč,

We respectfully acknowledge that the land we gather on is the unceded traditional territory of the K’ómoks First Nation,
the peoples traditionally known as the Sathloot, Saseetla, Eiksan, and Pentlatch.

tuwa akʷs χoχoɬ ʔa xʷ yiχmɛtɛt (ʔa) kʷʊms hɛhaw tʊms gɩǰɛ (Caretakers of the 'land of plenty' since time immemorial).

©2023 by SOFT-CVS. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page